Marine Traffic

Monday, June 22, 2009

Senator Murray on ARRA Funds for Washington State Mass Transit Projects

Funding will boost economy, support purchase of buses, maintenance of ferry vessels and terminals


June 19, 2009 -- (Washington, D.C.) – Today, U.S. Senator Patty Murray (D-WA) announced that $20,501,842 has been released in grants by the U.S. Department of Transportation for mass transit projects in Washington state. The grants were funded under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, and will be put to use improving transportation and creating jobs in Washington state.

“Recovery funds continue to flow into Washington state, and are being put to good use in our communities creating jobs and boosting the economy,” said Senator Patty Murray. “This mass-transit recovery funding will put people to work today, help our commuters, and keep businesses moving to sustain economic growth in the future.”

This funding comes from the nearly $700 million for Washington state transportation infrastructure that Senator Murray fought to include in the recovery package.

As the Chairman of the Transportation and Housing Appropriations Subcommittee overseeing funding for the Department of Transportation, Senator Murray worked to ensure that investments in transportation were included in the Recovery Act. Senator Murray voted to pass the Recovery Act on February 13th. The bill was signed into law by President Obama on February 17th.

Washington state recovery funding total: $20,501,842

* TACOMA: PIERCE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORATION BENEFIT AREA AUTHORITY: $11,371,075
Purchase 6 40 ft. buses, CNG Compressor and Preventive Maintenance
* WENATCHEE : CHELAN-DOUGLAS PTBA DBA LINK: $1,019,843
Replace 12 vehicles, 1 lift, shop lights, paint intermodal center, upgrade software
* KITSAP COUNTY: KITSAP TRANSIT: $2,861,382
Facility Expansion, Passenger Vessel and Vans
* WASHINGTON STATE DEPT. OF TRANSPORATION: $3,456,735
Vessel and Terminal Preservation
* WASHINGTON STATE DEPT. OF TRANSPORATION: $1,792,807
Preventive Maintenance and Ferry Vessels

Source: Senator Patty Murray


Powered by Qumana


Friday, June 19, 2009

Stimulus Funds on Way to Kitsap Transit, State Ferries - Kitsap Sun

By Ed Friedrich (Contact)
Friday, June 19, 2009


Washington, D.C.

Transportation stimulus funds are making their way across the country.

Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash, announced Friday that $20 million has been released for Washington state mass transit projects, including $2.8 million for Kitsap Transit and $5.2 million for Washington State Ferries.

Kitsap Transit, as determined in early March, will get $1.9 million for new vans, $875,000 for a small ferry for its Port Orchard-Bremerton route, and $95,000 for its Charleston-base expansion.

In April, the transit board approved spending $1 million in stimulus funds for 46 Toyota Sienna vans off the state list and in May authorized buying 31 larger vans from Bay Ford of Port Orchard for $844,000. They’ll replace old vans in the Rideshare program.

The $875,000 for the Port Orchard ferry would go toward buying and enlarging the Admiral Pete, which Kitsap Transit now leases from Kitsap Harbor Tours. The total cost is estimated at about $1.3 million, executive director Dick Hayes said.

Murray also said Friday that about $5.2 million of the $8.4 million designated for Washington State Ferries vessel and terminal preservation has been released.

Ferries director David Moseley said last week that the federal government has set aside another $5 million in non-stimulus money for boat preservation and $950,000 for propulsion systems for new vessels.

He said WSF has also applied for $26 million to replace the Anacortes terminal, $9 million to refurbish the Hyak, $7.6 million for projects to make boats more energy-efficient and $2.1 million to retrofit ferry engines to reduce air pollution.


Powered by Qumana


Thursday, June 18, 2009

WSF: Mistakes on Ferry Tickets Won't Affect Service to Bremerton - The kitsap Sun

BREMERTON — Bremerton ferry customers, envious of the fancy boats and frequent departures up north, often squawk when their tickets say “Bainbridge Island” on them.

Though Bainbridge and Bremerton tickets are interchangeable from Seattle, some believe Washington State Ferries is purposely skewing traffic counts to justify poorer Bremerton service.

That’s not true, ferry officials said Thursday.

Walk-on passengers are counted as they go through the turnstiles, so they can’t be miscounted even if their ticket is for the wrong destination, said Steve Rodgers, WSF director of operations. Only at the toll booths can mistakes be made, and sometimes they are, he said. But they cut both ways, for Bremerton and against it.

Here’s how it happens:

Bremerton and Bainbridge cars come through the same ticket lines. After a sale is made, the cash register stays on that destination until it is changed. If 10 straight Bainbridge cars are in line, the ticket seller won’t have to change it until a Bremerton car comes along, so the set-up can speed things up. They call it “throughput efficiency.”

The problem, explained Rogers and ferries spokeswoman Marta Coursey, is that some ticket sellers think getting the customer a speedy ticket is more important than getting one with the right destination on it.

“They’re instructed to always punch in the right destination,” Coursey said. “The issue is that our ticket sellers are very oriented toward customer service and trying to help the customer get through the line and get on the dock and get on the vessel.”

If it happens when there’s no rush, one can only assume the seller is too lazy to punch in the proper city.

Customers should clearly state their destination, Rogers said. If they get the wrong ticket, they can keep the receipt and report it. The seller can be identified from the receipt and will get a talking to. That’s usually sufficient, Rogers said. If not, they can climb the discipline ladder.

The ferry system has no way to track how often tickets are issued with the wrong destination, or whether it happens more often to Bremerton customers than Bainbridge. WSF gets four or five written complaints a year, Coursey said. As far as they can remember, none have come from Bainbridge.

The traffic counts are used for ridership forecasts and revenue projections, but not to make boat assignments and service decisions.

“Why people are complaining is because they’re concerned they’re treated differently from Bainbridge customers in terms of the vessels they get and the service provided,” Coursey said. “Our point is, there’s no correlation whatsoever.”

Usually, something like a newspaper letter to the editor rekindles this decades-long squabble, Coursey said. Paul Baumgaertner’s letter got it going this time.

The Rocky Point man said he recently got a ticket marked for Bainbridge, and it wasn’t the first time. But it was the first time he went back to the seller and asked for a new one. The seller told him it didn’t make any difference, but punched out a new ticket. It was also for Bainbridge. After a déjà vu discussion, the third time was the charm.

“I think it does make a difference,” Baumgaertner said of keeping accurate counts. “It’s important to have accurate data to properly allocate your equipment.”

Carlos Jara, who owns a store near the ferry dock, said a ferry official told him recently that Bainbridge was the default setting on the registers. According to Rogers, that’s true only when Bainbridge was the last sale made. Jara, who’s running for mayor, said he would press to get an accurate count, which might be as simple as laying down a hose vehicle counter.

Bainbridge Vs. Bremerton

How the Bainbridge Island and Bremerton ferry runs stack up against each other:

Vessels: Wenatchee (202 vehicles/2,500 passengers), Tacoma (202 vehicles/2,500 passengers)

Daily Departures: 23

2008 Ridership: 6,186,078 (1,951,316 vehicles, 4,234,762 passengers)

Bremerton

Vessels: Hyak (144 vehicles/2,500 passengers), Kitsap (124 vehicles/1,200 passengers)

Daily Departures: 14

2008 Ridership: 2,529,121 (664,771 vehicles, 1,864,350 passengers)


Powered by Qumana


Letter Bob Distler sent to State Officials



Dear Senator Ranker and Representatives Morris and Quall,

posted 06/15/2009
At a series of community meetings this month, Washington State Ferries discussed the status of its long-range plan, the tariff process and the next steps in exploring the feasibility of a reservations system. WSF senior management also outlined what it termed the legislature’s direction coming out of the 2009 session, including one that endorsed a scenario to fund “existing service levels.”

As it turns out, we in the San Juans will not be so fortunate.

As part of the San Juan County agenda, David Moseley reviewed a letter he received from the United States Coast Guard, dated August of last year, requiring WSF—among other things—to ensure that "all WSF deck watches . . . meet the 12 hours work in 24 hours [requirement] by September 30, 2009" based on concerns regarding crew endurance issues.

What that means for our Fall/Spring and Winter schedules is that the mainline boat that currently remains overnights in Friday Harbor instead will have to originate and terminate in Anacortes, along with other adjustments affecting the entire route’s schedule.

At the meeting, WSF discussed two alternative draft timetables to become effective in September—one that presumes no change to crew work rules in existing collective bargaining agreements and another based on some relaxation of those rules; both conform to the USCG direction of “not more than 12 in any 24.”

Either schedule will result in a significant degradation of intrastate service impacting everyone here in the San Juans, including interisland commuters to and from jobs and schools along with those of us making day trips to the mainland.

In fact, the only island unaffected by either of the draft alternatives will be Vancouver Island; service at Sidney BC would not be impacted.

This issue, which quickly became the focus of the meeting, was conducted on board the interisland ferry Sealth so as to afford residents of all islands a chance to participate, and the agenda was repeated so as to give everyone access to the discussion.

Some questions that come to mind:

If by August of last year WSF learned that it would be mandated to conform its operating schedules to new directives from the Coast Guard, did the Department of Transportation (WSDOT) provide for that requirement with a request for incremental funding as part of its 2009 submission so as to in fact ensure that “existing service levels” would be maintained?

Did this particular issue arise in any discussions between WSDOT, including WSF, and any of you or your respective staffs?

And finally, despite the very late hour—with WSF nearing its deadline to finalize the Fall schedule and the Coast Guard unlikely to essentially reverse its ruling of last year—is there anything that you, as our representatives in Olympia, can do, either fiscally or administratively, to preclude the significant hardships that either of these alternative schedules will impose on our island community?
Thank you for your consideration of these comments.

Bob Distler


Powered by Qumana


Carol Moser elected as State Transportation Commission Chair


Posted 6.17.09

Transportation Commission Office - PO Box 47308 - Olympia, WA 98504-7308
(360) 705-7070

Date: June 17, 2009

Contact:
Reema Griffith, Transportation Commission Executive Director, 360-705-7070

OLYMPIA – Richland’s Carol Moser has been elected to serve as Chair of the Washington State Transportation Commission. Member Bob Distler, who is from the San Juan Islands, will serve as Vice-chair. Commission members elect new officers every year; their terms become effective on July 1.

Moser has been a member of the Transportation Commission since 2006. She brings a local government perspective to the Commission having served for 10 years on the Richland City Council. She has also served on a variety of transportation boards including the Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board, Board of Directors for the Association of Washington Cities, Ben-Franklin Transit Board of Directors, Benton-Franklin Council of Governments, and is currently Chair of the Governor’s State Aviation Planning Council.

Distler came to the Commission in 2005 with an economics background and a career spanning several areas of transportation management – marketing, planning, operations, and government and industry affairs. Since moving to Orcas Island in 1972, Distler’s volunteer efforts have focused on transportation and growth management issues involving Washington State Ferries and San Juan County.

The Washington State Transportation Commission is an independent state agency that provides a public forum for transportation policy development. It reviews and evaluates how the entire transportation system works across the state and issues the state’s 20-year Transportation Plan. As the State Tolling Authority, the Commission sets tolls for state highways and bridges and fares for Washington State Ferries. The seven-member board is comprised of private citizens who are appointed by the Governor for six-year terms.


Powered by Qumana


Wednesday, June 17, 2009

Ranker lobbies members of Congress in D.C. for relief for San Juan ferry route - San Juan Islander



Citing the adverse impacts to commuters and the working families of the San Juan Islands, Sen. Kevin Ranker, D-San Juan Islands, recently met with several members of Congress in Washington D.C. and followed-up with letters urging them to reconsider a Coast Guard directive that changes the way Washington State Ferries has operated the San Juan Route for years.

"I fear this new directive, though well intentioned, will unleash many negative impacts on the quality of ferry service not only to the passengers of the San Juan route, but ferry routes all across Puget Sound," Ranker said.

Washington State Ferries redesigned the fall sailing schedule to accommodate the Coast Guard directive, which prohibits touring watches. Touring watches, where crews work two shifts with an on-board rest in between, have been an integral part of ferry service for the San Juan Islands. Shifting to a schedule without touring watches is intended to decrease crew stress and fatigue, but carries with it other costs.

By not using touring watches, which allows for more boats more often on the San Juan route, the new schedule must accommodate ferries no longer being moored in Friday Harbor overnight, which will decrease the availability of ferries. The diminished capacity will greater affect Eastbound traffic, impacting those who commute to jobs on the mainland.

"I'm hoping we can work together with the Coast Guard, WSF, and our congressional delegation to ensure crew and passenger safety, as well as providing the service levels to sustain the needs of our ferry-dependent communities," Ranker said.


Powered by Qumana


Friday, June 12, 2009

Plan C's next meeting

Hi All,
This is just to give you a "heads up" in preparing for July's meeting.
Walt Elliott of the Executive FAC Board called me a couple of days ago. He is putting an announcement in regarding the July 18th meeting in his article for his ferry community. We got to talking about the discussion the FAC Board had with the TC regarding the tariff committee. Seems the TC wants to pre-empt and set it up themselves and have it under their auspices. Their reasoning is that there isn't enough time to create legislation around this and they need a group to function this fall. Their (TC's ) consensus is that it would take too long.
I have some concerns about this. I don't want to see this group 1) under the sway of the TC - smacks too much of being assimilated into their bureacracy; 2) disbanded at the whim of the TC if the group does not agree; and 3) should be a legislated group to maintain it's independence from the TC and report to the governor or such. Walt has some concerns regarding this as well and this a continued discussion at their next meeting. Not all FAC board members feel this way and don't see a conflict of interests under the auspices of the Transportation Commission. Walt feels that in the interim, if the TC wants to set up something, that's fine, but that there should be some sort of legislation enacted moving forward after the Legislative session of 2010 that gives additional legitimacy to this group.
Since this is an on-going conversation at the FAC Executive level, I asked Walt if I could just relay this info to you, as well as the draft proposal for a Tariff committee written by Dennis Cziske Please note this is a working document well worth considering as a basis for upcoming legislation. I think it should be one of our topics when we meet on 7/18 and I hope Dennis and Walt can join us in Bremerton on that day.
PS. Is there any way we can also find out how/when members of the Transportation Commission are selected, how long their terms are and what constitutes qualifications? We have some members that are out of touch with ferry transportation issues - one track minds.
See all of you on 7/18!
Kari Ulatoski
Ferry Community Partnership
Chair, VMICC Ferry Outreach and Advocacy Committee
Plan C
__._,_.___

Attachment(s) from Fred Chang

1 of 1 File(s)

---------------------------------------------------------------------------This is a private e-mail list. It is neither funded nor endorsed by the Washington State Ferries. This message may reflect the opinion of this writer and not necessarily the consensus of the FAC as a whole.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------03032005
Recent Activity
Visit Your Group
Give Back

Yahoo! for Good

Get inspired

by a good cause.

Y! Toolbar

Get it Free!

easy 1-click access

to your groups.

Yahoo! Groups

Start a group

in 3 easy steps.

Connect with others.

.

__,_._,___

| Full Headers